Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Robert Reich begins: "Anyone who characterizes the deal between the President, Democratic, and Republican leaders as a victory for the American people over partisanship understands neither economics nor politics."

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)



Ransom Paid

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

01 August 11

 

nyone who characterizes the deal between the President, Democratic, and Republican leaders as a victory for the American people over partisanship understands neither economics nor politics.

The deal does not raise taxes on America's wealthy and most fortunate - who are now taking home a larger share of total income and wealth, and whose tax rates are already lower than they have been, in eighty years. Yet it puts the nation's most important safety nets and public investments on the chopping block.

It also hobbles the capacity of the government to respond to the jobs and growth crisis. Added to the cuts already underway by state and local governments, the deal's spending cuts increase the odds of a double-dip recession. And the deal strengthens the political hand of the radical right.

Yes, the deal is preferable to the unfolding economic catastrophe of a default on the debt of the U.S. government. The outrage and the shame is it has come to this choice.

More than a year ago, the President could have conditioned his agreement to extend the Bush tax cuts beyond 2010 on Republicans' agreement not to link a vote on the debt ceiling to the budget deficit. But he did not.

Many months ago, when Republicans first demanded spending cuts and no tax increases as a condition for raising the debt ceiling, the President could have blown their cover. He could have shown the American people why this demand had nothing to do with deficit reduction but everything to do with the GOP's ideological fixation on shrinking the size of the government - thereby imperiling Medicare, Social Security, education, infrastructure, and everything else Americans depend on. But he did not.

And through it all the President could have explained to Americans that the biggest economic challenge we face is restoring jobs and wages and economic growth, that spending cuts in the next few years will slow the economy even further, and therefore that the Republicans' demands threaten us all. Again, he did not.

The radical right has now won a huge tactical and strategic victory. Democrats and the White House have proven they have little by way of tactics or strategy.

By putting Medicare and Social Security on the block, they have made it more difficult for Democrats in the upcoming 2012 election cycle to blame Republicans for doing so.

By embracing deficit reduction as their apparent goal - claiming only that they'd seek to do it differently than the GOP - Democrats and the White House now seemingly agree with the GOP that the budget deficit is the biggest obstacle to the nation's future prosperity.

The budget deficit is not the biggest obstacle to our prosperity. Lack of jobs and growth is. And the largest threat to our democracy is the emergence of a radical right capable of getting most of the ransom it demands.


Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+24 # Rick Levy 2011-08-01 16:51
The American people probably understands the deficit problem better than does Democratic Party leadership.
 
 
+31 # papabob 2011-08-01 17:48
The slogan for the coming year should be REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER.

I know I will.
 
 
+31 # TrueAmericanPatriot 2011-08-01 18:29
So will I, and ALL OF US should. Kochs, baggers, blue dogs, repugs, Norquist minions, and the like. You have 15 months before the 2012 Elections; START PACKIN', NOW!!!!
 
 
+8 # cdcl44@yahoo.com 2011-08-02 08:54
For the November election, the American People need to demand explanation from the Republican Party proven reasons WHY the rich and corporations should continue getting their tax breaks.They have not said a word,other than "job creation" which we all know is a farce.
 
 
+20 # tarantilla 2011-08-01 19:50
The Republicans have added in this agreement a future defeat for the Democrats: the military phase-in budget cut. This will be cancelled by House Republicans, and Democrats who dare oppose will be characterized as "against our troops".
 
 
+20 # giraffee2012 2011-08-01 20:23
Please spend time going to neighborhoods where "new". voters have to get IDs and inform them to do it now. And register and get mail-in ballots NOW.

The GOP governors (& TP) have warned you they will block dems from voting in 2012.

Thank you

Spread the word to relatives and friends who live in these GOP run states
 
 
+2 # Dave1 2011-08-02 05:45
Please spend time going to neighborhoods where "new". voters have to get IDs and inform them to do it now. And register and get mail-in ballots NOW. The GOP governors (& TP) have warned you they will block dems from voting in 2012...Spread the word to relatives and friends who live in these GOP run states.
Thank you. They are stacking the deck for a complete rightwing coup, and our Sacred Vote is the most fundamental way to accomplish it. They not only hate our government, they hate its democracy as well.
 
 
+6 # giraffee2012 2011-08-01 20:27
http://progressivetoo.com/2011/07/09/eric-cantor-stands-to-profit-from-u-s-default/

I found this on Eric Cantor (minority head in house) -- Other TP are also spotted on this Web including Paul Ryan (not surprised, are you?)
 
 
+26 # disgusted American 2011-08-01 20:45
Everything leading up to this vote was a dog-and-pony show on the part of both parties designed to instill fear so that whatever the outcome would be, we would be grateful that the country didn't go into default.

And, the special commission will take care of destroying what today's vote didn't so that Democrats and Republicans have a scapegoat and can say they didn't do it. That's the point of the special commission which, I believe, is also referred to as the Super Congress.

Democrats are part and parcel of the agenda to depopulate this country by slow euthansia of the low-income earners and elderly and to also get rid of the middle class by turning these folks into slaves who will be willing to work for nothing b/c this will be better than no job at all. And those who can't find jobs, so what? The ruling class doesn't care. Its only goal is power, money and bombing every country on the planet.

Stop making excuses for Democrats by blaming Republicans. They all dine at the same trough.

November won't save you. For everyone you get out of office, two more pop up who are as bad or worse.
 
 
+1 # Dave1 2011-08-02 05:48
November won't save you. For everyone you get out of office, two more pop up who are as bad or worse.
...so then, what is to be done....?
 
 
0 # grindermonkey 2011-08-02 10:03
One enemy at a time over time. Never forget this fiasco.
 
 
+2 # Joe Vitovec 2011-08-01 21:58
It's a high time to draft a challenger--either Bernie Sanders or Russ Feingold, before the present Flim-Flam man sends the country into a tailspin, if it isn't there already.
I don't think that I'm the only one who feels that I have been had by a golden tongue and soothing promises that turned our dreams into a wasteland.
I hear that the presidential advisor say that the President can ignore its liberal/progressive base because they don't have anywhere to go. Wrong! I think I'm not the only one who is tired to vote for the "lesser evil." Come the next elections, I will not vote at all, rather than to perpetuate this macabre fraud.
 
 
+2 # stephen miller 2011-08-02 09:32
I think I'm not the only one who is tired to vote for the "lesser evil."

Yes we are tired of being complicit in our own destruction!
 
 
+1 # rtrues54 2011-08-02 14:13
Quoting
It's a high time to draft a challenger--either Bernie Sanders or Russ Feingold, before the present Flim-Flam man sends the country into a tailspin, if it isn't there already.
I don't think that I'm the only one who feels that I have been had by a golden tongue and soothing promises that turned our dreams into a wasteland.
I hear that the presidential advisor say that the President can ignore its liberal/progressive base because they don't have anywhere to go. Wrong! I think I'm not the only one who is tired to vote for the "lesser evil." Come the next elections, I will not vote at all, rather than to perpetuate this macabre fraud.


YES!! We MUST have a PROGRESSIVE challenger to Obama in the Dem Primaries. That is our ONLY Hope.
 
 
+1 # photonracer 2011-08-02 16:30
Joe! A non vote is merely silence and I can tell you don't want to be silent. When you vote and you want to protest write in "none of the above". You may get writer's cramp but it you want to have a voice, no matter how small, make the effort. Exercise your rights to the fullest or the bastards "win" by default. More power to you.
 
 
+3 # MidwestTom 2011-08-02 04:45
From what I have read the only real cuts in this deal are $7 billion in this fiscal year, and $3 billion in the following year. Then they ae supposed to make real cuts. However, a ,many in the current Congress will not be there, so what are the odds they will cut anything? My guess is very little will be cut. Remember that under Carter Congress passed a Balanced Budget amendment, and what has that brought us? No this bill allows Congress to continue on as usual, trying to deceive the American people, so they can continue on in the golden jobs and do as Wall Street requests. Print more money and enslave more people. Read the Road to Serfdom.
 
 
+3 # todd williams 2011-08-02 04:50
I wonder if it is unconstitutiona l for Congress to delegate spending cut decisions to a group of six people? If it is appears to be, then will there be a legal challenge to the new legislation? And how about automatic triggers? Again, unconstitutiona l?
 
 
+1 # grindermonkey 2011-08-02 10:05
They are most certainly shirking their constitutional duties.
 
 
0 # Jim Grandone 2011-08-02 05:03
I cannot wait to see the ads the DNC, DCCC, DSCC and Obama 2012 can run with the fodder the Republican Tea Party has given them. THey will annihilate the GOP.
 
 
+1 # grindermonkey 2011-08-02 10:07
What you suggest is a double edged sword that cut in many directions.
 
 
+7 # erogers 2011-08-02 05:42
Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. Mr. Obama will NOT be fooling me twice nor will he be fooling my family twice. I will NEVER vote Republican or Tea Party and the conduct of the Democrats over the past year means I will NOT vote Democrat in 2012. No more phony messages of hope. The Obama administration has turned its back on the very people he courted in order to win the White House. Please can we have a strong third party based on Progressive standards.
 
 
+1 # Sharksweetie 2011-08-02 08:49
Oh, how I wish we could find such a saviour!
 
 
+1 # Hexalpa 2011-08-02 10:00
I agree, erogers, but don't let Obama stop you from voting for "other Democratic candidates "down ticket". We quite OBVIOUSLY need a lot more Dems in both houses of Congress. But, for sure, if Obama heads the ticket (very likely) there needs to be hundreds of thousands (millions?) of "protest votes", Third Party votes that are clearly "liberal", that would-have-gone to the Democratic Candidate...if he were not Obama.
 
 
+1 # grindermonkey 2011-08-02 10:09
You have it in the Democratic Party remind them of their most successful predecessor, FDR.
 
 
+2 # Sharksweetie 2011-08-02 08:47
Unless something changes, none f us will be voting for a Democrat for President in 2012. Obama has crossed over the
line to the Republican camp - not the Tea Party yet, but . . . He has proven to be the weakest . most-inept President I have seen in my 66 years and becomes more irrelevant by the day. Whatever happened to his "I'd rather do what is right and be a one-term President"? He ha sold out the American people and WE WILL REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER!
 
 
+2 # Hexalpa 2011-08-02 09:54
Yes! Absolutely correct, if Obama is going to be the Democratic Candidate in November, then it doesn't matter which Party wins... either way you get a Republican who has sold out to corporate power and Wall Street. Vote for Democrats for Congress, especially those persons who showed some spine in opposing the Republicans (and/or the President), but if Obama "heads the ticket" vote for the Green Party Candidate for top office. They may not be able to "win", but this is a heck of a good way to show the power brokers in the Democratic Party that there are limits to what the Party Peons (us) "can stomach".
 
 
0 # grindermonkey 2011-08-02 10:11
And what candidate has the Green Party advanced?
 
 
+1 # Hexalpa 2011-08-02 10:08
Quoting
He has proven to be the weakest . most-inept President I have seen in my 66 years and becomes more irrelevant by the day.


What is there, Sharksweetie, about being 66 years old? (that's my exact age, and this Life-Long Democrat could not agree more with what you are saying here. Obama is Pathetic. It isn't that he is a "poor leader"...he simply ISN'T a leader. What LEADER negotiates (repeatedly) with the hierarchs of the opposition party, and DOESN'T INCLUDE his own stalwarts in the meetings??? Repeatedly, he has shamed Nancy Pelosi (a good, brave and very, very smart leader) and Harry Reed, by meeting in closed sessions with their "opposite numbers"...and not including them. Obama is vain, arrogant and INCOMPETENT as a so-called leader, and the movers and shakers of our sorry Party should NEVER have chosen him over Hillary. Only Chauvinism can explain that horrendous choice.
 
 
+3 # angelfish 2011-08-02 09:47
Silly me. I was under the impression that our elected Officials were supposed to be looking out for OUR best interests, NOT those of the Mega-Wealthy and Corporations. I don't see why charges of Treason and attempting to over-throw our legally elected President and his Administration can't be filed against these TOTALLY UN-American "ME First-ers"! Holding the Country HOSTAGE to their Dangerous and STUPID Agenda is anathema to EVERYTHING our Founders envisioned when creating this, once GREAT, Nation. It was SUPPOSED to be a Government OF, BY, and FOR the PEOPLE, not RICH people, ALL the people! The Majority of Americans ABHOR what these Ignorant "Newbie" members of the K.N.F.P.(Koch/Norquist Fascist Party)are doing to this Nation and it's people, most of whom are under-employed, UN-employed, Elderly, Sick or Dependent! Americans, take heed, LEARN about these bullies and WHAT it is they are trying to do to us. We must FIGHT them tooth and nail to regain our credibility with, not only ourselves, but the WORLD as well! God Bless and keep us safe during these Dark Days!
 
 
+1 # grindermonkey 2011-08-02 10:12
There is no deity looking over us now only the Angel of Darkness.
 
 
+1 # Hexalpa 2011-08-02 09:48
Yes, "all of the above" should start packing now...and YOU TOO Mr. President. I don't know whether you are a Republican in a Trojan Horse, or simply a spineless jellyfish of a coward, but you are sure as hell not a "leader" and NOT a Democrat. You make smooth speeches in which you lie, over and over, to the party base.
 
 
0 # bobby t. 2011-08-02 10:07
of course they are all partners in crime. that is a given, and has been since 1776. you guys are acting like this is something new? comeon...all are forgetting that the bush tax cuts sunset automatically unless forced to continue. that will be an important occasion. however, it maybe be put back if the right gets the majority in the senate. that is the battle ground. the middle is where the votes are. all you complainers will vote for obama again because you have to. you are not dumb, just angry. get cool, and as the buddha says, let go....it is over. you think they were going to hand over three trillion dollars from the top one percent with the numbers we have in congress. comeon folks, get real. this is hardball politics, grad school stuff. so stop with the kindergarten remarks. get positive. like maybe we should have had a national strike when reagan fired the air controllers? where were you? i was yelling for a national strike but everyone of my teacher buddies was cowardly.
 
 
0 # Hexalpa 2011-08-02 13:45
Quoting
...they are all partners in crime. that is a given, and has been since 1776. you guys are acting like this is something new? comeon...
That is a very cynical, condescending, and erroneous statement. Our country has produced some extraordinary presidents and capable statesmen in the past... just not lately, with a few shining exceptions like Robert Byrd and Richard Holbrooke. No, things haven't ALWAYS been this bad. Our political leaders haven't ALWAYS been bought and paid for. The good of "the people" and the "welfare of the Country" haven't ALWAYS been insincere blather...just lately. But even if IT HAD always been thus and such, that is no reason for this generation to settle for such feckless governance. You are welcome to "be a Buddah" and "just let it go", as if our country wasn't worth fighting for, but I have no desire to follow such a course of apathy. The wealthy and the privileged CAN be defeated by sheer numbers of committed voters. We all need to "think for ourselves", and vote our PERSONAL convictions... not whatever "talking points" are being spewed by whichever think-tanks. Let's remember that ALL commercial news media is beholden to moneyed interests (and PBS/NPR is cowed by the right-wingers who keep threatening their funding.
 
 
0 # bobby t. 2011-08-02 10:07
the ended the labor movement in this country. thanks guys for nothing...
 
 
+1 # bobby t. 2011-08-02 10:08
obama / clinton in 2012. for sure.
 
 
0 # Sue Swift 2011-08-02 11:07
What Obama's critics have failed to note: 1) the Bush tax cuts are still slated to expire; 2) if the bipartisan panel fails to reach agreement, the administration chooses where to cut, 3)the argument is deferred until after the 2012 election, when the Dems will take back power. It's the Republicans who have misstepped, and they'll reap the whirlwind.

Correction, Mr.Reich: social security is NOT on the chopping block.
 
 
+1 # Hexalpa 2011-08-02 13:59
Quoting
What Obama's critics have failed to note: 1) the Bush tax cuts are still slated to expire...
Yes. He had the opportunity to end the Bush cuts, and he FAILED to do so, instead he "kicked the can down the road" into the next administration (which just MIGHT be that of a Republican president. So, please... don't give him CREDIT for this stupid maneuver...he just dodged the hard decisions one more time, letting down his electoral base once again.
 
 
+1 # Hexalpa 2011-08-02 14:04
Quoting
Correction, Mr.Reich: social security is NOT on the chopping block.
That statement is "more lie than truth". SSI may not be "literally' on the table, but no attentive observer could possibly doubt that it is "dead-center in the gun-sight of the only political party that seems to be functioning effectively these days.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.