Excerpt: "Americans assaulted, clubbed, dragged, pepper-sprayed ... Why? For exercising their right to free speech and assembly - protesting the increasing concentration of income, wealth, and political power at the top. And what's Washington’s response? Nothing."
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Why We Must Occupy Democracy
23 November 11
The First Amendment upside down: Why we must Occupy Democracy.
ou've been seeing this across the country … Americans assaulted, clubbed, dragged, pepper-sprayed … Why? For exercising their right to free speech and assembly - protesting the increasing concentration of income, wealth, and political power at the top.
And what's Washington's response? Nothing. In fact, Congress's so-called "supercommittee" just disbanded because Republicans refuse to raise a penny of taxes on the rich.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court says money is speech and corporations are people. The Supreme Court's Citizens United decision last year ended all limits on political spending. Millions of dollars are being funneled to politicians without a trace.
And a revolving door has developed between official Washington and Wall Street - with bank executives becoming public officials who make rules that benefit the banks before heading back to the Street to make money off the rules they created.
Other top officials, including an increasing proportion of former members of congress, are cashing in by joining lobbying power houses and pressuring their former colleagues to do whatever their clients want.
Millionaires and billionaires on Wall Street and in executive suites aren't contributing all this money out of sheer love of country. Their political spending is analogous to their other investments. Mostly they want low tax rates and friendly regulations.
Why else do you suppose tax rates on the super rich are now lower than they've been in three decades, and why - even though the long-term budget deficit is horrendous - those rates aren't rising? Why else do the 400 richest Americans (whose wealth is larger than the combined wealth of the bottom 150 million Americans) now pay an average tax rate of only 17 percent?
Why do you think Wall Street got bailed without a single string attached - not even being required to help homeowners to whom they sold mortgages, who are now so far under water they're drowning? And why does the financial reform legislation have loopholes big enough for bankers to drive their Ferrari's through?
And why else are oil companies, big agribusinesses, military contractors, and the pharmaceutical industry reaping billions of dollars of government subsidies and special tax breaks?
Experts say the 2012 presidential race is likely to be the priciest ever, costing an estimated $6 billion. "It is far worse than it has ever been," says Republican Senator John McCain.
If there's a single core message to the Occupier movement it's that the increasing concentration of income and wealth at the top endangers our democracy. With money comes political power.
Yet when real people without money assemble to express their dissatisfaction with all this, they're told the First Amendment doesn't apply. Instead, they're treated as public nuisances - clubbed, pepper-sprayed, thrown out of public parks and evicted from public spaces.
Across America, public officials are saying Occupiers have to go. Even in universities - where free speech is supposed to be sacrosanct - peaceful assembly is being met with clubs and pepper spray.
The First Amendment is being stood on its head. Money speaks, and an unlimited amount of it can now be spent bribing and cajoling politicians. Yet peaceful assembly is viewed as a public nuisance and removed by force.
This is especially worrisome now that so many Americans are in economic trouble. The jobs recession grinds on, seemingly without end. Homes are being foreclosed upon. Qualified students cannot afford college. Or they're forced to take on huge debt loads they can't repay in a jobless economy. Schools are firing teachers. Vital social services are being axed.
How are Americans to be heard about what should be done about any of this if they are not allowed to mobilize and organize? When the freedom of speech goes to the highest bidder, moneyed interests have a disproportionate say.
Now more than ever, the First Amendment needs to be put right side up. Nothing less than the future of our democracy is at stake.
Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |












Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
We need to occupy our democracy...everything Robert said is spot on!
OCCUPY OCCUPY OCCUPY!!!
As the 1% and especially their flying monkeys get more worried, their tactics will turn more fierce. People stand tall and lock arms we can hold them off, we are the 99% (except for the flying monkeys)
John Adams
The past does not dictate the future, it informs it.
Absolutely true, LL, assuming we are willing to look at the past clearly and honestly and actually SEE what is there rather than just seeing what we want to see. That is increasingly difficult, given the spin machines that provide what so many people consider "news."
received negative response, Martin. Possibly, if you had posted something along the lines of "Democrats good! Republicans bad," you would have been praised. People, Please do read, and please do think.
Apparently I am not to blame democrat politicians for writing bail out checks - only republican bankers for cashing them.
Maybe If I just tell half truths - like blame republican politicians for writing the bail out checks I'd be more popular - truth is not a popularity contest.
There is a stark difference between "rooting for the demise" [of democracy], and warning others of the ways in which democracy has historically "crashed and burned" in the past.
We do much to prevent future train wrecks by studying the way in which wrecks have been known to happen in the past and during the present. Said study is not the logical equivalent of "rooting for a train wreck".
It must be a burden to know it all, but it remains wise to think before we speak.
What's with all the "thumbs down" people ? Can't take the truth ?
In this post Martin presents information that is not only historically accurate, (google Greek Republic, Roman Republic, et al,) he is also loosely quoting one of your founding fathers.
So is that a "thumbs down" for John Adams ?
To quote another dead ancestor, "Know your enemy, and know yourself". - Sun Tzu, Art Of War.
All of the thumbs down seem to represent a knee-jerk response that amounts to "killing the messenger".
Just because we may not *like* the truth that Martintfe brings forth here, there could be no more dangerous response than sticking our collective heads in the sand.
Quoting again "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
Lighten up on the messenger, folks, we need all the data we can gather to take this present problem on. It is, as Reich indicates above, nothing less than the "Last Stand Of American Democracy" that is under discussion here.
Yes, your points are very well taken, and a reminder that, in the original document, "We The People" meant: Free, White, Male, Landowner, over the age of 21. Women, blacks, Indians, non-land holders, come under the umbrella of "We The People" in legal status only many years and (for some) decades after the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence was originally written.
Economically speaking, we were indeed literally founded as an Oligarchy. The more things change, the more they remain the same.
But now, it is time for real and certain change. For all of it's apparent growing pains, I think history will look back to OWS as the beginning of the end for *all* of the old systems - economic, social, legal, political, et al - and as the birth of the new paradigm. Birth, of course, is frequently attended by tension, trauma and pain until the final delivery is accomplished.
We must take money out of politic through public funding of election with absolutely no private money allowed. Influence of all PAC must be limited by prohibiting private meetings,gifts, & sponsored travel with absolutely no exceptions. Also sovereign nations &/or their ex-pat's & supporter must be prohibited from forming PAC's to influence USA government officials.
Additionally we must free the reporting of news & current events from the influence of corporate sponsors, governments & PACs by requiring it be broadcast as a public service for use of the people's airwaves, Also all programs that discuss news & current events must be labelled "commentary, opinion, not based on fact" throughout the broadcast & announced at the beginning & end of all commercial breaks.
When the Constitutional Right to Peacefully Protest is violated,
is it no longer an internal state issue
to be tackled by the governor or mayor.
It is on his desk!
He was sworn in with his hand on the Bible to uphold the Constitution and the
only thing we have heard from him was when he was mic checked and he was just arrogantly saying "That´s OK, That´s OK"
as a father correcting and excusing his
naughty children.
Axelrod was quoted saying about Michelle
Obama´s campaign activities:
"Her mission is to energize folks
and give them encouragement to go out and do the work"
What about making her mission to energize
her husband and give him the encouragement to go out and do the work he was elected to do.
I do not want a Repugnut in the W.H. or Congress - so my opinion is: We will get changes after 2012 if we get a majority of Dems + President Obama in the W.H.
He is not KING and not PERFECT - but all GOP are part of the Guber Norquist cult and where will that lead us?
Get all Dems (and u 2) registered early with mail-in ballots for the most important elections to date: 2012
http://contract.rebuildthedream.com/?rc=rtd_home
If President Obama wished to run in 2016, I would wish him well, hoping he had learned what is required to truly represent all of the citizens of this nation, not just the wealthy 2%.
How distasteful that this man who has done next to nothing he promised is patronizing the occupiers -- the REAL leaders and heroes -- for standing against the pack of jackals he runs with.
Never Vote Republican is right and good -- but how about a chance to vote for a Democrat? In a nutshell, how much more of BushWorld can we stand?
If the campaigns coming up are going to be a money fest, so be it. Just don't listen to any of the BS and let them waste their money.
OWS genius is that we can have our own primary elections and organize for representation outside of the Circus of Washington D.C. Get together in your own towns. Find your own candidates. Create "Write in Campaigns". This electronic age is freeing up democracy because we can now communicate outside of Madison Ave and K Street!
OWS has struck at the heart of a giant that knows it has no REAL power. It has money, yes. It has influence in Washington, yes. What it doesn't have is the people.
General Strike and Tax Payer Strike and we win the Day.
Always vote democratic - the alternative could make your head explode.
We need to re-elect Obama with a Congress that will do the will of the 99% Once Obama is freed from re-election concerns he can focus on the demands of the 99% & previous campaign promises. Congress doesn't work on a simple majority (50%) to pass a 99% agenda requires 67% in House & 61 votes in Senate. That's why Obama hasn't been able to do anything or had to compromise. For 2012 our only hope is to prevent either ruling party from having the majority(51 votes) in the Senate forcing coalitions while electing at least 60% in House. The ideal coalitions partner for the 99% is the Dems.
The best chance for 99% platform would be to co-opt all the progressive independent parties joining them under the 99% banner to provide all 50 state ballot access. Than only run a slate Congressional & state government candidates in every state. Requiring every candidate to sign the platform document promising to enact the 99% ideals, starting with public funding of political campaigns & requiring news to be broadcast as public service.
The last thing we want is to split the ruling party vote for President by running a 3rd party candidate to the mix, Historically it has resulted in a GOP win.
After we eat the first 1% and the premise of cannibalism is acceptable so then it is just a matter of deciding who the next 1% will be.
What do you say Madam Defarge?
Nobody wants to eat the 1%. We want a government that isn't corrupt.
Is there a way to "Occupy Democracy" other than the relatively slow process of getting better people elected to office? This article doesn't really offer answers for how the First Amendment can be put right side up. It's an understatement to say the situation in our country now is pretty depressing.
American Constitution begins with:
" WE THE 99% ... "
not as that which we can bring to light, but as that which
is other from what we cannot forget without losing
everything that makes being human possibly divine rather
than infinitely base and horrific. What must I remember?
This becomes the question that will cost everything if it
is forgotten.
Occupy the Oligarchy! Democracy is a figment of our imagination.
I believe there is a Supreme Court case here. People vs U.S. The Constitution clearly states that the purpose of govt. is to protect and insure the rights of the people. Liberty is one of the most important of those rights and is defined as creating, maintaining households and owning property. The govt. has allowed an infringement on the Liberty of the people by letting sources of capital to be monopolized by a small minority of people.
This case obviously needs to be tightened up. But I think a Supreme Court ruling is the only way to get permanent reform.
What do you think Mr. Reich?
YES YES YES. Framing the case is a shade more problematic though than your straightforward analysis proposes. Would that it were so easy. The perfect Case for the purpose of reestablishing all five of the proclaimed constitutional values (Justice, Tranquility, defence, Welfare and Liberty) is identified and presented at the website "Might Is Not Right" at http://mightisnotright.org/. And please consider “Who Owns Wall Street Anyway. THE SEQUEL," Reader Supported News, November 17, 2011, at http://readersupportednews.org//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=8464.
Perhaps so, but he has it all in neat and orderly flow; organized in one place where people who might need help with that task can access it. That is, in fact, what writers and teachers do.
There may be many people who haven't heard much of what is discussed here. Especially people who rely upon the MSM for their information.
Sometimes it's not all about you or me.
RSS feed for comments to this post.