Barry Lando concludes: "The same corrupt Saudi regime that fueled Bin Laden's outrage is still in power, still backed by the United States. Indeed, they have been doing their utmost to tamp the spreading revolt, spending millions to bribe Yemen's tribal leaders, dispatching their troops to Bahrain to help crush the uprising of the Shiite majority in that country. Indeed, that brutal repression may radicalize thousands of young Shiites, generating hosts of new recruits for al Qaeda or other extremists Islamic groups - even as the corpse of Osama bin Laden lies somewhere at the bottom of the sea."
Osama bin Laden is seen at an undisclosed location in this television image, 10/07/01. (photo: Al Jazeera/AP)
Osama bin Laden: Everyone's Missing the Point
02 May 11
he jubilation of Americans and Western leaders at the death of Osama bin Laden, though understandable, misses the point. In many ways, the figure gunned down in Pakistan was already irrelevant - more a symbol of past dangers than a real threat for the future.
Indeed, from the point of view of America and many of its allies, the most menacing symbol in the Arab World today is not Osama bin Laden but another Arab who recently met a violent death - Mohamed Bouazizi, the 26-year-old Tunisian fruit vendor who chose to set himself on fire after being harassed by corrupt local police.
His act, of course, ignited the storm that has spread across the Arab World and proven a much more serious threat to America's allies in the region than al Qaeda ever was. Ironically, his sacrifice probably also dealt a far more devastating blow to al Qaeda's fortunes than the assassination of Osama bin Laden.
The Arab world today bears no relationship to the situation a decade ago after 9/11. Obsessed with bin Laden and al Qaeda, the US has been sucked into a vast quagmire - a disaster for the Americans, their economy, and their standing in the Arab World.
What particularly provoked Osama bin Laden - a Saudi - was the decision of Saudi rulers to accept the presence of more than a hundred thousand "infidel" US troops and their allies in Saudi Arabia following Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait. In general, he and his followers were outraged by US support for corrupt, repressive regimes from Saudi Arabia to Egypt to Yemen, as well, of course, for America's backing of Israel.
As Osama himself told CNN in 1997, "the US wants to occupy our countries, steal our resources, impose agents on us to rule us and then wants us to agree to all this. If we refuse to do so, it says we are terrorists ... Wherever we look, we find the US as the leader of terrorism and crime in the world."
Bin Laden's message resonated throughout the Muslim world. But US officials remained deaf to its meaning, and continued obsessed with al Qaeda and its Taliban allies. The upshot - US policy was the best recruiter Osama could have asked for. Over the past decade, hundreds of thousands of American soldiers, CIA killer teams, mercenaries, predators, and "diplomats" swarmed across the region from Iraq to Afghanistan to Pakistan to Yemen and Somalia, supported by sprawling new bases and pharaonic embassies.
The bill for all this - for an America crippled by cutbacks in health, infrastructure. and education - will be in the trillions of dollars. But despite this massive effort, none of those targeted Arab countries could by any stretch of the imagination be considered a success story. Hostility to the US is high throughout the region. In polls, the majority of those Arabs queried consider the United States a greater threat than al Qaeda.
In Pakistan, despite the US lavishing tens of billions of dollars on that country's military, it turns out that Osama bin Laden, rather than groveling as an outlaw in the isolated tribal regions, has been living in a fortified villa near the country's major military academy and a large army base, just a few miles away from the capital city.
America had also launched an ambitious civilian aid program: $7.5 billion over five years, designed to win Pakistani hearts and minds and bolster the civilian government. But, corruption is so rife throughout the Pakistani government, and its officials so incompetent, that the US has been unable to disburse most of the aid. As the New York Times reports:
Instead of polishing the tarnished image of America with a suspicious, even hostile, Pakistani public and government, the plan has resulted in bitterness and a sense of broken promises ...
The economy is failing. Education, health care and other services are almost nonexistent, while civilian leaders from the landed and industrialist classes pay hardly any taxes.
Pakistanis see the aid as a crude attempt to buy friendship and an effort to alleviate antipathy toward United States drone attacks against militants in the tribal areas.
The same reports come from Afghanistan. A decade after the US invaded, tens of thousands of American troops are still fighting what seems to be, at best, a see-saw battle against the Taliban. There also, according to another report in the New York Times , the US is backing incompetent, corrupt, unpopular leaders. Millions of dollars of US funds actually get diverted as payoffs to the Taliban and their allies - bribing them not to attack US projects, such as $65 million highway that may never be completed in Eastern Afghanistan.
The vast expenses and unsavory alliances surrounding the highway have become a parable of the corruption and mismanagement that turns so many well-intended development efforts in Afghanistan into sinkholes for the money of American taxpayers, even nine years into the war.
Now back to Mohamed Bouazizi the Tunisian fruit vendor whose death unleashed the Arab Spring that is still roiling the region.
Though Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda have yet to be credited with overthrowing an Arab regime, the spark provided by Bouazizi has already led to the downfall of American-backed tyrants in Tunisia and Egypt, and continues to threaten other despots in Libya, Yemen, Syria and Bahrain.
Ironically, most of the leaders overthrown or desperately trying to hang on to power had declared themselves implacable enemies of al Qaeda. Yet, again, it was not Bin Laden, but Bouazizi, who turned out to be a far greater menace.
Precisely for that reason, it is Bouazizi's Arab Spring, not sophisticated US killer teams, that most threaten al Qaeda and its allies. By demonstrating that secular uprisings can succeed in toppling the aged, crusty tyrannies, young Arabs across the region have - so far - undercut the appeal of the Islamic radicals.
So far, because despite the early successes in Tunisia and Egypt, the future of the Arab Spring is far from clear. The current process will take decades to play out. The political and economic establishments have been decapitated in Egypt and Tunisia, but not decimated. In the rest of the region, though seriously shaken, the old order still reigns supreme.
The same corrupt Saudi regime that fueled Bin Laden's outrage is still in power, still backed by the United States. Indeed, they have been doing their utmost to tamp the spreading revolt, spending millions to bribe Yemen's tribal leaders, dispatching their troops to Bahrain to help crush the uprising of the Shiite majority in that country.
Indeed, that brutal repression may radicalize thousands of young Shiites, generating hosts of new recruits for al Qaeda or other extremists Islamic groups - even as the corpse of Osama bin Laden lies somewhere at the bottom of the sea.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |












Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Why in the world would someone quote Osama, on such a shallow view?
And, as I think back, when Jimmy Carter started the covert funding to help the Mujahideen stop the Imperialist USSR, who invaded Afghanistan - not with the idea of returning it to it's people, but rather with the determination to conquer the country and make it yet another puppet Communist satellite on it's way to conquer Pakistan in it's quest for a southern route to the sea, it all comes back to me.
Fortunately Reagan continued Carter's effort and eventually the USSR was forced to retreat.
The problem here was that in the void that was left behind, the US (Dems and R's) and the UN let Afghanistan rot. When the Taliban took control (horrible period of time) well, what did we expect - the US and the UN did nothing.
So here we are - both trying to keep the radical imperialists out of Afghanistan, and trying to return the country to it's rightful people.
It may not be going well - but we do have the high ground here - not Bin Bin.
I'd offer that any discussion, about the past 30 yrs, doesn't require looking back past the country's last King, Mohammad Zahir Shah.
Only the USSR sought imperialist control over Afghanistan during this period.
The Taliban may somehow fit that description, but does seem a stretch. Like the USSR, they did seek to maintain an iron fist on the country once they seized control.
As in Iraq (as ugly as it was - the effort), in the end President Bush signed the agreement with the Iraqi government to withdraw all forces, the goal is the same in Afghanistan; return it to the people.
And I agree - it will not go well. Why? The left, never saw it, the DR Congo (the most deadly conflict since WW II - 1996 to present), Sierra Leone, Liberia, the Ivory Coast, Algiers, Kosovo, Iraq (1 1/'2 to 2 million killed) etc.. as a SaveDarfur.org.
You see, they generally only jump to their feet - and generally only get broad media attention when there is a conservative in office - otherwise, they lay low and try to make believe like it isn't going on.
I'll leave you to ponder the DR Congo - and how this was going on, just as President Clinton was promising to the world, "Never Again."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/video/2007/nov/02/congo
Now how do we keep these wars going?
We're not in Afghanistan, Iraq and now Libya because we want to see womens rights protected and fruit sellers kept from self immolation due to inequality, injustice and poverty. It's the oil. It's still the oil.
But you have to remember--they OWN us.
Look -- Osama must be extended the presumption of innocence is any author is to claim to be a civilized and rational person. There has been no trial of Osama, no presentation of evidence, and no conviction. There has not even been ANY investigation of who planned and carried out the crimes of 9-11. The Commission simply assumed al Queda did it and moved on to make recommendations about how to boost up the US police state. Much of the evidence it incidently uncovered points away from Osama.
So take away the charge that Osama blew up the WTC on Sept 11 and what is left -- a Saudi nationalist who wants the US occupation of his nation to end. He wants US colonialism in the middle east to end. I'm with Osama on that and against Bush/Cheney/Obama. Colonialism and military occupation are crimes against humanity according to UN conventions. Blaming Osama clouds the real issue in the world which is US military conquest of Muslim nations. Osama was right about world events and US leaders wrong. That's why the question of who planned 9-11 is really only a way to propagandize people's minds. It is as Barry Lando says irrelevant to the important things in the world right now. But stupid TV addicted Amerikkkans will never get that.
I have stacks of print outs and video of investigations by universities and individual engineers, pilots,et al., in numerous countries and in the U.S., but have NEVER been able to get any friend or family to read or view it. Typical.
There was no bin Laden.
None of this is circulating on the internet, it is actual research done by universities, engineers, students, and researchers world wide. The U.S. does not operate in a vacuum. Too much suspicious action to be overlooked by the world at large.
Oh, and the bin Laden stuff was proven to be faked. He never admitted to being the source of the attacks on New York. If Muslims are unhappy with the West, ask yourself why.
If there are those capable of that, why not lie about Osama bin Laden and various groups. Those lies would benefit the goals of the U.S. government far more than lying about Chavez.
I agree with you 100%. Here we are the majority of Americans, living in the midst of total deception and celebrating a totally false reality speaks to the fact that the average American has not spent ten minutes in a Ten year time period actually studying the obvious deceptions presented to the American people after 9/11 by the so called "news media", actually the hand maiden of the Bush Administration. The character, Osama Bin Laden gave Bush and the military/industrial complex a money making war for the ruling elite. Osama Bin Laden is now giving Obama a much needed increase in approval ratings and a great thrust in pursuing the 2012 bid for his second term as President of the United States. However, the fact remains, "We The People" are blood thirsty, shallow and so very easily deceived.
Sincerely,
Steve Miller
As another poster stated, "immorality does have a trickle down effect".
RSS feed for comments to this post.