A Very Brief Analysis of Gravity and WTC 1,2,7
by John Machado
Wednesday, 30 November 2011 13:16
A VERY BRIEF ANALYSIS OF GRAVITY AND WTC 1, 2, 7
On 9-11-01, three Manhattan buildings collapsed after two of them were struck by aircraft. Much of the related materials, aka, evidence, has been removed. But, the official report and video recordings of the actual collapses pinpoint the precise time of the fall of each building into itself. Those times cannot be reconciled with Newton’s Laws of Gravity without concluding that demolition materials removed supports and structural matter during the collapse events. Here is a simple summary of the proof and a reason to look well beyond the scope of current beliefs and the official report:
According to Isaac Newton’s very well respected and time-tested formula for any object falling in what is referred to as “free fall,” the time it would take to drop through a vacuum .. a vacuum being no resistance at all .. from the height of the towers as they stood at 1360 feet, would be 9.22 seconds. That would translate to about 11 to 12 seconds if the fall were in air and not a vacuum. Each roof of the tower buildings was an object and eventually, an object in motion. The official report and the many observations of recordings of the collapses conclude that the fall of each tower was over in 11 to 12 seconds. But, that’s the same time as free fall, and that would be impossible without the removal of all resistance. Therefore: demolition materials. Therefore: access. Therefore: expertise. Therefore: not the suspects previously named.
WTC 1, 2 .. the towers:
Newton/ vacuum Newton / air
9.22 seconds 11-12 seconds
actual time: differential:
11 to 12 seconds - 0 –
WTC 7, with no plane and no fuel and no serious damage, collapsed at 5:20 pm … some 24 minutes or so AFTER the BBC announced its collapse and about 3 minutes AFTER Fox News announced its collapse and it did so in 6.5 seconds. Newton’s formula says such a fall .. roof to ground .. in a vacuum would have taken 5.9 seconds, 6.5 in air.
WTC 7 .. 47 stories:
Newton / vacuum Newton / air
5.9 seconds 6.5 seconds
actual time: differential:
6.5 seconds - 0 –
The zero differential between the predictable fall time in air and actual fall time through supports, floors, furniture, plumbing and contents is absolute .. no guesswork .. proof of access. Airplanes were decoys. The crime was a clever case of mass deception.
The real criminals should be named, arrested and tried. America and the victims’ families deserve that much. Our system of justice cannot afford to drop the ball on this.
(See also: Cheney, Rumsfeld, Silverstein, et al)
On 9-11-01, three Manhattan buildings collapsed after two of them were struck by aircraft. Much of the related materials, aka, evidence, has been removed. But, the official report and video recordings of the actual collapses pinpoint the precise time of the fall of each building into itself. Those times cannot be reconciled with Newton’s Laws of Gravity without concluding that demolition materials removed supports and structural matter during the collapse events. Here is a simple summary of the proof and a reason to look well beyond the scope of current beliefs and the official report:
According to Isaac Newton’s very well respected and time-tested formula for any object falling in what is referred to as “free fall,” the time it would take to drop through a vacuum .. a vacuum being no resistance at all .. from the height of the towers as they stood at 1360 feet, would be 9.22 seconds. That would translate to about 11 to 12 seconds if the fall were in air and not a vacuum. Each roof of the tower buildings was an object and eventually, an object in motion. The official report and the many observations of recordings of the collapses conclude that the fall of each tower was over in 11 to 12 seconds. But, that’s the same time as free fall, and that would be impossible without the removal of all resistance. Therefore: demolition materials. Therefore: access. Therefore: expertise. Therefore: not the suspects previously named.
WTC 1, 2 .. the towers:
Newton/ vacuum Newton / air
9.22 seconds 11-12 seconds
actual time: differential:
11 to 12 seconds - 0 –
WTC 7, with no plane and no fuel and no serious damage, collapsed at 5:20 pm … some 24 minutes or so AFTER the BBC announced its collapse and about 3 minutes AFTER Fox News announced its collapse and it did so in 6.5 seconds. Newton’s formula says such a fall .. roof to ground .. in a vacuum would have taken 5.9 seconds, 6.5 in air.
WTC 7 .. 47 stories:
Newton / vacuum Newton / air
5.9 seconds 6.5 seconds
actual time: differential:
6.5 seconds - 0 –
The zero differential between the predictable fall time in air and actual fall time through supports, floors, furniture, plumbing and contents is absolute .. no guesswork .. proof of access. Airplanes were decoys. The crime was a clever case of mass deception.
The real criminals should be named, arrested and tried. America and the victims’ families deserve that much. Our system of justice cannot afford to drop the ball on this.
(See also: Cheney, Rumsfeld, Silverstein, et al)
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
ARTICLE VIEWS: 362
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
|
In succession, governments in the European Union are kicked out of office for having prescribed to their peoples rigid “savings programs” with the aim of regaining their national Wednesday, 23 May 2012 |
|
Source: Amazon Defense Coalition, Contact: Karen Hinton, Karen@hintoncommunications.com, 703-798-3109http://chevrontoxico.com/http://thechevronpit.blogspot.com/An epic showdown between angry Chevron Tuesday, 22 May 2012 |
|
Does no one else find the very fact of John Edwards being on trial curious? Does no one else wonder about the criminal basis for the prosecution? About who in politics does and does not end up being Tuesday, 22 May 2012 |
|
by Stephen Wilson, LetsFixThisCountry.orgUnder cover of New Years Eve last year, when the fewest Americans would notice, Barack Obama signed into law an act that disgraces his presidency.In mid-May a Monday, 21 May 2012 |
|
How comforting to discover, long before $2 billion evaporates in our quadrennial mayhem of misdirection, the finale! Survey says: Obama gets an encore, unless the wary one flubs big-time or a Black Monday, 21 May 2012 |
|
By Steve HornEnvironmental victories are so scarce these days that you can’t blame eco-activists for trumpeting any good news — even when the news turns out to be mostly smoke and mirrors.Take Monday, 21 May 2012 |
|
In 1905 representatives of 43 groups who opposed the policies of American Federation of Labour, formed the radical labour organisation, the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW). The IWW's goal was Monday, 21 May 2012 |











Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
RSS feed for comments to this post.