Humanizing the Guilty
Saturday, 14 January 2012 07:33
Sebastian Junger in his article "We're All Guilty of Dehumanizing the Enemy" doesn't really get it.
Dehumanizing the enemy in war as a means of psychologically distancing oneself from otherwise unacceptable acts of "murder" is not what caused certain U.S. Marines to desecrate enemy dead in Afghanistan. It's a nice, pat psychological supposition that misses the real point.
The military is a culture predicated on the precept of necessary killing at times for the "greater good." Within that framework, there are specific rules of engagement set forth differentiating accepted and unaccepted behavior. We can argue about the virtues or non-virtues of war, the morality or immorality of it, but troops, if properly trained and supervised, know the non-gray area, standard operational right from wrong under which they are to carry out their duties. The spiritual-philosophical arguments concerning war notwithstanding, the direct causal trigger for the Marines urinating on the bodies of dead enemy combatants is a breakdown in discipline.
The broad, philosophical brush of conditioned human barbarity in which Junger paints this incident, while not unrelated, is too obliquely connected to understand the immediate problem and cause. These Marines chose to disobey the rules defining their cause and behavior. They disregarded command injunctions, because of undisciplined combat detachment. Somewhere there was a breakdown of intervening self-discipline in the chain of command. And, therein, lies the immediate cause and correction in advancement of combat-stress diagnosis and waited human evolution.
Carl Hitchens
Author, Vietnam combat Marine veteran
http://www.drumtalk-hitch.com/Sitting_with_Warrior/Sitting_with_Warrior.html
Dehumanizing the enemy in war as a means of psychologically distancing oneself from otherwise unacceptable acts of "murder" is not what caused certain U.S. Marines to desecrate enemy dead in Afghanistan. It's a nice, pat psychological supposition that misses the real point.
The military is a culture predicated on the precept of necessary killing at times for the "greater good." Within that framework, there are specific rules of engagement set forth differentiating accepted and unaccepted behavior. We can argue about the virtues or non-virtues of war, the morality or immorality of it, but troops, if properly trained and supervised, know the non-gray area, standard operational right from wrong under which they are to carry out their duties. The spiritual-philosophical arguments concerning war notwithstanding, the direct causal trigger for the Marines urinating on the bodies of dead enemy combatants is a breakdown in discipline.
The broad, philosophical brush of conditioned human barbarity in which Junger paints this incident, while not unrelated, is too obliquely connected to understand the immediate problem and cause. These Marines chose to disobey the rules defining their cause and behavior. They disregarded command injunctions, because of undisciplined combat detachment. Somewhere there was a breakdown of intervening self-discipline in the chain of command. And, therein, lies the immediate cause and correction in advancement of combat-stress diagnosis and waited human evolution.
Carl Hitchens
Author, Vietnam combat Marine veteran
http://www.drumtalk-hitch.com/Sitting_with_Warrior/Sitting_with_Warrior.html
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
ARTICLE VIEWS: 319
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
|
In succession, governments in the European Union are kicked out of office for having prescribed to their peoples rigid “savings programs” with the aim of regaining their national Wednesday, 23 May 2012 |
|
Source: Amazon Defense Coalition, Contact: Karen Hinton, Karen@hintoncommunications.com, 703-798-3109http://chevrontoxico.com/http://thechevronpit.blogspot.com/An epic showdown between angry Chevron Tuesday, 22 May 2012 |
|
Does no one else find the very fact of John Edwards being on trial curious? Does no one else wonder about the criminal basis for the prosecution? About who in politics does and does not end up being Tuesday, 22 May 2012 |
|
by Stephen Wilson, LetsFixThisCountry.orgUnder cover of New Years Eve last year, when the fewest Americans would notice, Barack Obama signed into law an act that disgraces his presidency.In mid-May a Monday, 21 May 2012 |
|
How comforting to discover, long before $2 billion evaporates in our quadrennial mayhem of misdirection, the finale! Survey says: Obama gets an encore, unless the wary one flubs big-time or a Black Monday, 21 May 2012 |
|
By Steve HornEnvironmental victories are so scarce these days that you can’t blame eco-activists for trumpeting any good news — even when the news turns out to be mostly smoke and mirrors.Take Monday, 21 May 2012 |
|
In 1905 representatives of 43 groups who opposed the policies of American Federation of Labour, formed the radical labour organisation, the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW). The IWW's goal was Monday, 21 May 2012 |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
But soldiers are trained to view the enemies of the US as "sub-humans." Thus all of the dehumanization is in the heads of the soldiers and political leaders who are doing the brutalizing, killing and pissing.
The analogy here is rape. The victim is not de-humanized, but the rapist is. His actions are felt to be anti-human or less than human. We expect better from human beings. It is the same with racism and the use of racist epithets. The word "ni**er" says nothing about an african american. But it says a great deal about the person who uses it. It is what he thinks.
So the actions here don't say anything about the Taliban. They are all about the marines. They are what is in the minds of the marines, and it is not very human or humane. It is sub-human. Being a marine is to give up your humanity, to dehumanize yourself. Someday when they are no longer marines, they will recover their humanity.
RSS feed for comments to this post.