Share
Email This Page
add comment

writing for godot

THE IMPLICATIONS OF LAST NIGHT’S ELECTION IN NEW YORK

Print
Wednesday, 25 May 2011 09:03


It’s times like this where I really, really miss our late roommate, Daniel Conan Weiner. He was a Libertarian (which, since I’m an unabashed and unashamed liberal, and WonderWifeTheEngineer was, at the time, an unabashed and unashamed Log Cabin Republican) used to make for some very interesting dinner-time conversations.

He’d have had an absolute hysterical laughing fit at what has happened to the Libertarian (now known as the Tea Party) Party, when their political theorizing has turned into actual fact, and they can’t wrap their consciousness around the simple declaration that the real world simply doesn’t work like their rosy vision of it should. Take a look at the Free State Project, which has been an absolutely abysmal failure (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_State_Project). After all their research and all of their huffing and puffing, they don’t even have 1,000 people on the ground in New Hampshire.

What’s even more interesting, I think, is that every single, solitary Libertarian (except for Dan) that I’ve ever known – and I’ve know a shitload of them – has been a worshiper at the Shrine of St. Ayn Rand.

I blush to admit that I was an enthusiastic promoter of her ideas, once upon a time. Fortunately, I got over it. Unfortunately, and catastrophically for our economic system, folks like Allen Greenspan didn’t. You can see the havoc still being wreaked by his application of Randian economic philosophy on our economy. You can especially see it in people like Paul Ryan, who requires everybody that works for him, even the volunteers, to read THE FOUNTAINHEAD and ATLAS SHRUGGED. You can see her philosophies regarding her version of reason and rationality here: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism_(Ayn_Rand). Briefly put, Objectivism holds that reality exists independent of consciousness, that human beings have direct contact with reality through sense perception, that one can attain objective knowledge from perception through the process of concept formation and inductive and deductive logic, that the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness or rational self-interest, that the only social system consistent with this morality is full respect for individual rights, embodied in laissez faire capitalism, and that the role of art in human life is to transform man's widest metaphysical ideas, by selective reproduction of reality, into a physical form – a work of art - that he can comprehend and to which he can respond emotionally.

I go back once a year, and read everything that she ever published, just to remind myself how very much I dislike her philosophies and her collectivist viewpoint. And this, gangers, leads up to the special election last night in New York’s District 26. A DEMOCRAT, folks, took the Republican-ruby red district. The ReThug© that she defeated would have voted for the Ryan Budget Plan if she’d been in Congress at that time (in essence, throwing, not just Grandma, but everybody that needs Federal help to get meds and medical treatment IE Medicare and Medicaid off the cliff – literally), and the #3 person in the race was a Tea Partier. Totals: 47%, 43%, 8%. I believe – and I admit, I also HOPE with all my heart – that this election marks the beginning of the end for the Libertarian/Tea Party and their ivory tower philosophies, which are based wholly in the writings of a woman who was a collectivist in her writings and whose philosophies have caused and continue to cause more problems than we can support at this point.

Ms. Rand believed in reason and rationality about all else. Unfortunately, most people that take up that philosophy turn out to be ruthless sons-of-bitches (and ruthless bitches as well) who couldn’t care less about social responsibility, community responsibility and the debt that we owe our grandchildren and great-grandchildren to leave them with a higher standard of living. The debt peonage that most of us labour under these days is a direct outgrowth of Randian philosophies of “reason” and “rational behaviours”.

The Tea Party “patriots” and the Libertarians have lost this round. Let’s us all do our best to insure that they lose the rest.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+2 # RSJ 2011-05-26 04:12
Good post, Wilma Howe-Bennett. I'd only add that the Ayn Rand worshippers are those who, to paraphrase Lincoln, have not had her philosophy tried on them. If Paul Ryan or the other 'Objectivist' fanatics had to live on Social Secuirty and depend for their health on Medicare, they wouldn't be spouting this nonsense.

Most of them don't know, or ignore the fact, that their Queen had to depend on both gov't programs at the end of her life -- the selfish little boys she had trained so well wouldn't send any money to the elderly 'parasite' she had become, not even to prolong her life.

I'd have to disagree regarding all of the Teabaggers being Libertarians. I have known both varieties, and some of the Teabaggers don't have the brains to be Libertarians -- they think it has something to do with wild sex parties -- or good Objectivists -- they don't read, and they wouldn't understand it if they did. Many of the Teabaggers are just not-too-bright people with a chip on their shoulder who would rather blame 'liberals' or 'socialists' or whoever for their situation rather than take steps to cure it, and wallow like hogs in their ignorance and fear. Before the Civil War, they were the poor 'white overseers' who groveled to their masters and took out their resentments on defenseless black slaves.
 
 
+4 # viscount 2011-05-26 04:17
People need to be clear about Ayn Rand and her faux philosophy. It is a thinly veiled version of social Darwinism (read
stealth Calvinism)which has nothing to do with rationality or legitimate self-interest. Rand was a total phony who bragged that her chain smoking would do her no harm...and then died of lung cancer after taking Medicare payments.

One more thing we all need to be clear about is this matter of calling Tea Party
people and their Republican fellow travelers "conservatives." They are, in fact, reactionary fascists, plain and simple. That is not an arguable opinion.
One need only watch their behavior and listen to their statements to understand that.
 
 
0 # RSJ 2011-05-26 14:00
You're right, Viscount, calling Teabaggers conservatives does a disservice to those conservatives who were (and are) as appalled at the Bush administration and the current GOP as progressives. There may not be many of them left, but they aren't crazed dupes or racist morons.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.