Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "Senate Armed Services Chair Carl Levin - a Democrat from Michigan - had just put down the gavel, marking the end of the confirmation hearing for Leon Panetta to be the next Secretary of Defense, when Detroit-born CODEPINK activist Tighe Barry jumped up. 'Shame on you, Senator Levin, for supporting endless wars while Detroit is dying,' he shouted. 'Your constituents are eating cat food while you're funding a champagne war.' Levin shook his head in disgust, dismissing Barry as some kind of kook, and walked out of the room."

Onboard a medevac helicopter, Army Chief SPC Jenny Martinez holds the hand of a Marine who was wounded in an IED strike in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, 06/04/11. (photo: Anja Niedringhaus/AP)
Onboard a medevac helicopter, Army Chief SPC Jenny Martinez holds the hand of a Marine who was wounded in an IED strike in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, 06/04/11. (photo: Anja Niedringhaus/AP)



Will US Mayors Vote Against War?

By Medea Benjamin, Reader Supported News

17 June 11

 

enate Armed Services Chair Carl Levin - a Democrat from Michigan - had just put down the gavel, marking the end of the confirmation hearing for Leon Panetta to be the next Secretary of Defense, when Detroit-born CODEPINK activist Tighe Barry jumped up. "Shame on you, Senator Levin, for supporting endless wars while Detroit is dying," he shouted. "Your constituents are eating cat food while you're funding a champagne war." Levin shook his head in disgust, dismissing Barry as some kind of kook, and walked out of the room.

But Barry's words ring true. The city of Detroit stands as a mirror to the United States' battered economy and failing wars. Our nation's continued military exploits in Iraq and Afghanistan are fueling Detroit's destruction. Taxpayers from Detroit shell out over two billion dollars a year for war, money that could cover healthcare for over 150,000 children or the payment of some 3,000 teachers' salaries.

While Senator Levin might not want to make the link between war funding and the financial woes of our cities, mayors around the country are doing just that. At this year's annual US Conference of Mayors, to be held from June 17-21 in Baltimore, hundreds of mayors will gather to discuss diverse issues from job growth to homeland security. One of the issues they will vote on is the Bring Our War Dollars Home resolution, introduced by Mayor Kitty Piercy from Eugene, Oregon, which calls on Congress to redirect military spending to domestic priorities.

Thanks to the work of localgrassroots activists under the leadership of CODEPINK's Bring Our War Dollars Home campaign, the resolution has 20 cosponsors from cities such as Minneapolis, Baltimore, Santa Fe and Ithaca. All agree that the wars' combined cost of over one trillion dollars would be better spent in job creation, health care, sustainable energy, infrastructure, and programs to reduce poverty and crime in American cities. "We are spending a billion a month after Osama bin Laden has been killed. And while I appreciate the effort to rebuild nations around the world, we have tremendous needs in communities like mine," said Joseph C. O'Brien, the Mayor of Worcester, MA and a co-sponsor of the resolution.

The US Conference of Mayors is not known for challenging foreign policy and hasn't called for an end to a US military engagement since the days of Vietnam. But even the Conference's mainstream Executive Director Tom Cochran seems fed up with Washington's priorities. "As the slashing continues by Washington targeted to American cities, $150 billion a year is poured into the Afghanistan War. The money being sent and spent abroad goes unchecked. The small amount provided for infrastructure, security, community development here in the USA is slashed," Cochran wrote in the April 25 edition of US Mayor.

This basic frustration evades the grasp of the Washington Post Editorial Board, which in a June 11 opinion piece entitled "The Afghan Withdrawal," dismissed the claim that the United States can no longer afford the $2 billion a week being spent on the war, stating that "the marginal billions that might be gained from withdrawing more troops now will have no significant impact on a deficit problem measured in trillions." The mayors, the elected officials closest to the people living without food in their bellies, money in their bank accounts, and roofs over their heads, do not underestimate the power of "marginal billions." A supporter of the Bring Our War Dollars Home Resolution, Mayor Joanne Twomey from Biddeford, Maine, knows how people living in small cities, like her 20,000 constituents, could benefit from bringing home the massive amounts of federal funding that has been sent overseas. "In Biddeford we are cutting $1.6 million in our education budget," complained Mayor Joanne Twomey from Biddeford, Maine, a supporter of the Bring Our War Dollars Home Resolution. "It's my responsibility as mayor to start saying if our priorities were straight, if we could bring these war dollars home, I wouldn't have to be doing this, and neither would the Biddeford school board."

CODEPINK organizer C.J. Minster, who has been working for months on the mayor's campaign, thinks the mayors' resolution has a good chance of passing. "We look forward to helping the mayors use their collective power to remind the federal government that true human security includes freedom from hunger, job opportunities, health security, and environmental protection," said Minster.


Medea Benjamin ( This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ) is cofounder of Global Exchange (www.globalexchange.org) and CODEPINK: Women for Peace (www.codepinkalert.org). She is the author of "Don't Be Afraid Gringo: A Honduran Woman Speaks From the Heart."

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+16 # granny 2011-06-17 08:46
Carl Levin needs to think seriously about supporting any further war mongering.
 
 
+20 # rongcro 2011-06-17 09:26
The only people/corporations profiting from our useless wars are those making up our huge military/industrial complex. Money thrown in the bottomless pits of Iraq or Afganistan is money we won't have to spend where it is needed: at home. As long as war profiteering corporations can buy our politicians, we ordinary citizens will have little say about when we quit sacrificing our domestic needs to the war monster.
 
 
+10 # Loup-Bouc 2011-06-17 11:01
The wars' combined costs are NOT $1 trillion. They were $6.5 trillion as of October 2010. Why does the progressive press continue to eat the garbage data the government keeps feeding the mass media?
 
 
+9 # mtnview 2011-06-17 11:50
Sadly, what will end these wars is when the military personel themselves say their own families do not have the rights and opportunities our military is supposedly defending in far away lands. In no way is this placing the blame nor responsibility on military personel, rather its a recognition of every soldier, sailor or airman's dilema. When the empire can not longer support the supply line of its troops (and this includes on-time pay for military families) nor the medical care for its casualities, its time for the empire to withdraw. May it be so. Soon.
 
 
+7 # signalfire 2011-06-17 12:46
Carl Levin needs to go fight the war himself if he's so hot on the idea.

Carl Levin needs to forfeit his Congressional salary and perks including health care, until ALL Americans have like coverage.

Carl Levin needs to understand that those of us out here in reality land are oiling our rifles, buying ammo, and stockpiling food in case the Empire decides to start fighting a war against it's own people.

Carl Levin needs to understand that 'to provide for the common defense' starts at home and if all Americans are not properly fed, housed and educated, spurious threats of terrorism are inconsequential .

Carl Levin needs to be tried on charges of treason with the usual punishment for such, if he doesn't get a clue and soon.

Carl Levin needs to stop reading BS 'intelligence' papers and realize where the real threat is.

Carl Levin needs to represent the People or suffer the consequences, and soon.
 
 
+7 # tomo 2011-06-17 12:48
Good for Medea to write such an article. And shame on Carl to support such a war. It's pretty disgusting after hearing my fellow Democrats complain for eight years about the dirty wars of George II to notice now the stench-ladden silence of the same Democrats when it comes to Obama's war in Afghanistan. How strange that our Democrat wars are somehow sanctified wars but the Republican wars--fought pretty much in the same place with the same people and the same lack of any rationale--were the very wars from hell!
 
 
+4 # SocialDem 2011-06-17 13:55
Let's remember that Senator Carl Levin spoke out against going into Iraq, and as one of only 13 senators to vote against giving President Bush the authorization to go to war against Iraq.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.